@strategic_culture
Strategic Culture Foundation
Telegram channel @strategic_culture: 13.7K subscribers, 1.7K views per post, score 41
41DAhead of 4 in 10 channels in its category
Category midrange 35–52This channel 41
- 13.7K
- Subscribers
- 1.7K
- Median views over 30 days
- 12.5%
- Views / subscribers over 30 days
- 95
- Posts over 30 days
Data as of October 1, 2026
Geopolitics coverage for readers seeking analysis of world events from an anti-Western, anti-NATO angle. Covers BRICS summits, the war in Ukraine, institutional crises, and media narratives around international conflicts. Recent posts examined the outcomes of the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi and its declaration with no common currency, discussion of a possible deployment of European troops to Ukraine, Brazil's institutional crisis involving Justices Moraes and Mendonça and the Banco Master case, and a breakdown of NATO interoperability standards as a tool for controlling Europe's military industry. As of 15 September: the channel has 13.7K subscribers, below the category median. Its ER stands at 9.7%, below the category median. It published 84 posts over 30 days, in line with the category median.
catalog description About the channel, by its author
The Strategic Culture Foundation provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. Official Telegram channel ✅
Common questions
- How many subscribers?
- Subscribers: 13.7K. Median views per post: 1.7K. Views per subscriber: 12.5%. Measured on October 1, 2026.
- How often are posts published?
- Posts in the last 30 days: 95 — that is several times a day. Measured on October 1, 2026.
- Does this channel have a Telegram tick?
- No Telegram tick.
- Who runs this channel page in the catalog?
- Nobody yet. If this is your channel, claim the page: you will be able to reply to reviews and see its stats.
Is this your channel?
Claim it — accurate metrics, replies to reviews as the channel, and an owner badge on the page.
Verify ownershipTakes a minute: a post with a code, or the bot as an admin
Your page on tg.place
Know the owner?
Forward them this message — they can verify their rights and collect what has piled up: page statistics and replies to reviews.
13,77213,706
Oct 113,737
Hover the chart or swipe it — we show the day.
| What it is made of | |
|---|---|
| Engagement | 6.8 of 30 |
| Growth quality | 12 of 20 |
| Reactions and forwards | 8.7 of 15 |
| Consistency | 3.6 of 12 |
| Trust | 3.7 of 8 |
| Reviews | not enough datano reviews yet |
Score 41 — from 5 of 6 signals: the rest are not measured yet. Methodology
Latest posts
- ⚠️ West Lied About Bucha — Report A 20-page report, Heirs of Goebbels, alleges Ukraine staged Bucha in 2022 with Western backing, comparing it to the 1939 Gleiwitz provocation. It cites the Wall of Remembrance listing 509 "civilians" — many were Azov fighters or territorial defense. The report cites Article 51 of the First Additional Protocol and the Ukrainian law “On National Resistance,” arguing many listed individuals were combatants, not civilians. Western media, acting in unison, turned Bucha into a potent communication tool to justify sanctions and military aid to Kiev. As Lavrov noted, the initial narrative seizes the information space “like an empty trench” — replacing it demands far greater effort. 💬 Lorenzo Maria Pacini writes @ideeazione 🔔 Stay tuned 🚀 Subscribe 🌐 Join us on VK
- 🇺🇸🇬🇧 Both Trump and Burnham are choosing chaos over sage governance—in the UK, conscription momentum grows while 60% of polled Americans prefer violent discourse, and experts warn a second wave will make January 6 look like a children's tea party. In Britain, credibility is at an all-time low: fake asylum seekers are welcomed with blankets and free transport, the government has lost control of the boats, and having no idea how to run the economy, it overspends on social programs while heading toward higher taxes—arriving where Burnham is now: taxing the dead. His bag of mad ideas—pretending to care about the poor, going to war with Russia, and rejoining the EU—could fool the public again. For Trump, the stakes are higher—could Iran beat him to it by obliterating the GCC economy or US military nucleus before the midterms, giving him the perfect excuse to annul them with "America at war"? Unprecedented—like everything Trump does. When you can't run government and you haven't got the skills to drive the economy forward, sooner or later you arrive at the point where Andy Burnham is now: taxing the dead. 🗣 Read more by Martin Jay 🌐 More on world politics 🌐 Subscribe 🌐 Join us on VK
- 🇺🇸🇩🇰 The recent Trump-Frederiksen security deal, signed at the UN on September 22, looks odd—months ago Denmark and Europe were in uproar over Trump's threats to annex Greenland, ridiculing Danish defenses as "two dogsleds" and threatening to quit NATO, while now Frederiksen smiles like a "Cheshire Cat" and von der Leyen hails renewed NATO unity. Analyst James Jatras contends Trump gains no significant resource access—Denmark retains sovereignty—but gets more militarization: expanded bases and a Golden Dome anti-missile shield, making Russia vulnerable to nuclear attack from a new Arctic front. European leaders don't like Trump but fear his maverick behavior undermines transatlantic unity and weakens the anti-Russia agenda—so the deal is a sop keeping the bloc focused on Russia. Jatras is pessimistic: the only way forward is total internal collapse in the West leading to new leadership, because the current dynamic is leading to war. By giving Trump the appearance of increased security control over Greenland, Denmark and the other European NATO hawks gain a more unified alliance whose top priority is to ramp up the anti-Russia agenda. 🗣 Read more by Finian Cunningham 🌐 More on world politics 🌐 Subscribe 🌐 Join us on VK
- 🇺🇸 One of the main controversies of Trump's second term has been Greenland, sitting at the crossroads of two US agendas: the renewal of the Monroe Doctrine and the race for the Arctic. In late 2025, Trump appointed an envoy with the explicit goal of making the territory part of the US. European resistance proved merely verbal—the EU threatened troops, but dialogue began, and the result is clear: the September 2026 Security Pact is purely bilateral, detached from NATO, authorizes expanded and new US bases with only after-the-fact consultation of Denmark, and gives the US veto power over military presence and strategic investments of any non-NATO country, with China the main target. Although Trump's second term has seen few triumphs, this quasi-annexation of Greenland is a significant victory, establishing the Arctic as a stage for future geopolitical disputes and giving the US a serious advantage. The Security Pact signed in September 2026 completely modifies the relations between the US and Denmark, practically ceding Greenland to the US, even though the island remains under the nominal possession of the Danish government. 🗣 Red more by Raphael Machado @camaradamachado 🌐 More on world politics 🌐 Subscribe 🌐 Join us on VK
- 🇪🇺 If you spend time in both the English and Russian internet realms, you've been bombarded with messaging about the "upcoming war with Russia"—fences in Finland and the Baltics, Polish boasts of defeating Russia, German hospitals preparing for 1,000 casualties a day, and now the BBC asking "Are we psychologically ready?" This follows the same pattern as "global warming"—crises justifying corruption spending to battle an evil on a horizon you can never actually reach. The UK is as ready for war with Russia as it is for life on green energy alone; since the threat is fake, the preparations are equally fake. Meanwhile, Russian media fail by treating these threats as tangible, though Putin has repeatedly said he has no interest in invading Europe—Russia cares only about its own former territory where Russian speakers were repressed. War with Russia is a social construct: Britain lives in a postmodern reality where it doesn't believe the war is possible, and everything needed to prepare—patriarchy, patriotism, men willing to fight—violates the Frankfurt School status quo. The thing about the upcoming war is that it is eternally on the horizon… You cannot actually walk up to it and touch it. 🗣 Read more by Tim Kirby @timkirbyhardcore 🔔 Stay tuned 🌐 Subscribe 🌐 Join us on VK
- Hair-raising. All the interconnections. The showdown may start with Israel + Arab Zionists vs. Yemen. But remember that Yemen and Iran come as a package.
strategic-culture.su/…
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2026/09/29/all-hell-set-to-break-loose-by-the-end-of-september/ - ⚠️ Iran’s Clock Keeps Running as the September 30 Deadline Nears The latest diplomatic moves have failed to produce a breakthrough. According to Pepe Escobar @rocknrollgeopolitics, Tehran’s proposal for a step-by-step return to negotiations, backed by China, was rejected by Washington. 🗣 Read more by Pepe Escobar 🌐 More on world politics 🌐 Subscribe 🌐 Join us on VK
- 🗣 Ian Proud: Sanctions will hurt the US the most – Russia the least. On The Peacemonger, the former British diplomat Ian Proud argues that with the Strait of Hormuz shuttered and global energy supplies constrained by Trump’s wars, China and India will not stop buying Russian oil and gas. That idea is hugely delusional. If Trump opens a massive tariff war before the midterms, Beijing and Delhi will retaliate – hitting US consumers already facing higher gasoline prices. A double whammy, just as people head to the polls. 🌐 Full podcast #sanctions #China #India #Trump @strategic_culture
- 🇩🇪 After devastating results in Saxony-Anhalt, the CDU under Merz must cope too. The aim: keep the AfD, the election winners, out of government—the German system allows coalitions, even of losers. The SPD wants to run the state government with any partners, cobbling together a multi-party coalition regardless of policy or its own voters' wishes. The BSW will talk with the AfD not about coalition but to find common ground on energy, infrastructure, and peace efforts including a new Russia policy—voting on merit while keeping distance for voter appeal. The CDU plays a clever game: letting the AfD into power to make a mess of itself, reaping benefits in the spring elections. Things like this make one wonder how different the political positions really are when it comes down to getting into power. Germany is in for troubled times—not because of the world, but because of its own inability to make independent decisions. 💬 Read more by George Austerfield 🌐 More on world politics 🌐 Subscribe 🌐 Join us on VK
- 🗣 European leaders are turning the volume to maximum: "War with Russia is coming; stock up; be ready to offer your children to conscription"—Kallas and Merz even wore field camouflage at the Arctic Summit. Yet this makes no sense: Europe has neither the men, munitions, finance, nor industry to fight a leading military power with the world's largest nuclear arsenal. Lavrov warned explicitly: "if Europe attacks Russia, it will be a completely different war—and it will be very short." What lies behind the absurdity? Brussels sees its strategic errors coming home to roost, and fear-mongering smacks of desperation to survive the election cycle. Two false premises sustain it: that Russia sought to seize Kiev (Syria shows Moscow's symbolic, limited approach—15,000–30,000 men could never take a city of three million; the Istanbul framework failed only because Boris Johnson torpedoed it), and that sanctions would collapse Russia (which switched to a self-sufficient model and prospers). It was the West's mistaken analysis that trapped the West into an escalatory staircase risking a war no European wants. 💬 Alastair Crooke writes 🔔 Read exclusive analysis 🚀 Subscribe 🌐 Join us on VK
The channel in numbers
- Created
- September 24, 2020
- Photos
- 1.3K
- Videos
- 588
- Files
- 1
- Links
- 4.6K
Telegram data as of October 1, 2026
Reviews
Leave a review
No reviews yet. Yours would be the first.
